<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xml:lang="en" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><title>Recent changes to 29: Support real-time systems</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/log4cpp/feature-requests/29/" rel="alternate"/><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/log4cpp/feature-requests/29/feed.atom" rel="self"/><id>https://sourceforge.net/p/log4cpp/feature-requests/29/</id><updated>2009-09-12T20:08:23Z</updated><subtitle>Recent changes to 29: Support real-time systems</subtitle><entry><title>Support real-time systems</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/log4cpp/feature-requests/29/" rel="alternate"/><published>2009-09-12T20:08:23Z</published><updated>2009-09-12T20:08:23Z</updated><author><name>Stephen Roderick</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/sroderick/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.net0dcc11b63b11e73bfab6707b92ad618b66828e6f</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;We are looking for a log4j-style, C++ logging package to use in soft- and hard-realtime robotic systems. I was wondering if anyone has previously considered using log4cpp in realtime systems? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Obviously, appenders that write to disc, etc, would be in non-real-time parts of the system, but the ability to log from real-time tasks would be extremely useful. The real killer here is dynamic memory allocation, which log4cpp uses liberally. Without a O(c) allocator (few operating systems provide this), it is unuseable in real-time. Reviewing the code, it would require significant modifications to support real-time, however, this appears to be much more doable than with log4cxx, etc, due to a decent class design (and far less dependancies than APR!).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I was just wondering if it had ever been considered?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cheers&lt;br /&gt;
Stephen&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry></feed>