<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Recent changes to 29: Support real-time systems</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/log4cpp/feature-requests/29/</link><description>Recent changes to 29: Support real-time systems</description><atom:link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/log4cpp/feature-requests/29/feed.rss" rel="self"/><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 20:08:23 -0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/log4cpp/feature-requests/29/feed.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Support real-time systems</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/log4cpp/feature-requests/29/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;We are looking for a log4j-style, C++ logging package to use in soft- and hard-realtime robotic systems. I was wondering if anyone has previously considered using log4cpp in realtime systems? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Obviously, appenders that write to disc, etc, would be in non-real-time parts of the system, but the ability to log from real-time tasks would be extremely useful. The real killer here is dynamic memory allocation, which log4cpp uses liberally. Without a O(c) allocator (few operating systems provide this), it is unuseable in real-time. Reviewing the code, it would require significant modifications to support real-time, however, this appears to be much more doable than with log4cxx, etc, due to a decent class design (and far less dependancies than APR!).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I was just wondering if it had ever been considered?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cheers&lt;br /&gt;
Stephen&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stephen Roderick</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 20:08:23 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net0dcc11b63b11e73bfab6707b92ad618b66828e6f</guid></item></channel></rss>