Re: [Visualpython-users] Experimental clean import capability

I'm fine with that too, and it's even shorter, which I like more. :-)

    Craig

On Oct 11, 2010, at 2:19 PM, Bruce Sherwood wrote:

> Suppose the clean folder is named simply vis? There does not seem to
> exist a Python module named vis. It's short, which is nice for those
> who prefer to use the full name, as in vis.box(), and by its shortness
> it has the flavor of "visual but without the extras imported by
> visual". It's similar to your first choice but without the py, which
> seems a bit superfluous in the Python environment. And on the other
> hand, if someone starts a new project dealing with visualization
> they're more likely to call it vispy than vis, because of tradition
> (scipy, numpy, etc.).
> 
> Whaddya think?
> 
> I hope that some people other than me actually try out the machinery I
> posted and say whether in fact it satisfies their needs.
> 
> Bruce Sherwood
> 
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 8:31 AM, Craig Struble
> <cra...@ma...> wrote:
>> I don't like visual_parts at all. Too long and is unlike just about every other Python module out there. If vpython is off the table, I'd prefer the names in the order of 1) vispy, 2) visualpy, 3) vislib, 4) visuallib, 5) libvis, 6) libvisual.
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
> standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1,  ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3.
> Spend less time writing and  rewriting code and more time creating great
> experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb
> _______________________________________________
> Visualpython-users mailing list
> Vis...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/visualpython-users

--
Craig A. Struble, Ph.D. | Marquette University
Associate Professor of Computer Science | 369 Cudahy Hall
(414)288-3783 | (414)288-5472 (fax)
http://www.mscs.mu.edu/~cstruble | cra...@ma...